Do ISO-Based Management Systems and Board Gender Diversity Enhance ESG Performance? Evidence from ASEAN Banks

Duwi Agustina(1*), Rindu Rika Gamayuni(2), Agrianti Komalasari(3),

(1) Doctoral Candidate, University of Lampung, Indonesia
(2) University of Lampung, Indonesia
(3) University of Lampung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The increasing pressure for sustainable business practices has encouraged banking firms in the ASEAN region to strengthen their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. This study aims to examine the effect of ISO-based management systems (MS) and board gender diversity (BGD) on the ESG performance of ASEAN banks during the 2018–2023 period. Using a quantitative approach with panel data analysis, this study employed balanced panel observations from banking companies listed in five ASEAN countries. The estimation was conducted using the panel estimated generalized least squares (EGLS) method with the random effect model selected through several model specification tests. The findings reveal that ISO-based management systems have a positive and significant effect on ESG performance, indicating that the adoption of international management standards contributes to improving sustainability performance in the banking sector. In contrast, board gender diversity does not show a significant effect on ESG performance, which may be due to the relatively low proportion of female directors that has not yet reached the critical mass required to influence strategic decision-making effectively. The study concludes that ISO certification serves as an effective governance mechanism in promoting sustainability practices within ASEAN banking firms.

 


Keywords


ESG Performance, ISO-based management systems, Board Gender Diversity

References


Abdullah, A. (2026). Gender diversity and ESG performance: The moderating role of the sustainability committee. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(3), 3878–3897.

Ajina, A., Najah, A. B., & Jouini, F. (2025). CO2 Emissions and Firm Performance: Assessing the Effectiveness of the Paris Agreement and the Moderating Role of ESG Performance and ISO 14001 Certification. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(6), 8026–8051. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70119

Alkhawaja, A., Hu, F., Johl, S., & Nadarajah, S. (2023). Board gender diversity, quotas, and ESG disclosure: Global evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102823. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102823

Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033

Baltagi, B. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. In Vasa.

Basile, V., Serino, L., & Ambra, A. D. (2026). Board characteristics and effects on ESG performance : empirical evidence from the European banking system. 2121–2138.

Brahma, S., Nwafor, C., & Boateng, A. (2021). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(4), 5704–5719. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2089

Durak Uşar, D. (2024). Impact of ISO Certifications on Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange-Listed Manufacturing Companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167021

Feyisetan, O. O. (2026). Board Gender Diversity and Innovation Strategies : Sectoral Effects on ESG Performance in Financial and Non-Financial Firms. 1–22.

Fonseca, L., & Carvalho, F. (2019). The reporting of SDGs by quality, environmental, and occupational health and safety-certified organizations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205797

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management A Stakeholder Approach. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675

Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2026). The impact of board gender diversity on ESG disclosure . A contingency perspective. 33(7), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2024-2567

Gebhardt, M., Thun, T. W., Seefloth, M., & Zülch, H. (2023). Managing sustainability—Does the integration of environmental, social and governance key performance indicators in the internal management systems contribute to companies’ environmental, social and governance performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2175–2192. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3242

Gutiérrez-Ponce, H., & Wibowo, S. A. (2024). Do sustainability practices contribute to the financial performance of banks? An analysis of banks in Southeast Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 1418–1432. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2641

Hakimi, A., Boussaada, R., & Karmani, M. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: a threshold analysis of European firms. European Journal of Management and Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2022-0224

Hidayah, N., & Aziz, A. (2025). ESG Controversies and Firm Performance in ASEAN : Do Board Gender Diversity and Sustainability Committee Matter ? https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70094

Jay, B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advangages. In Journal of Management (Vol. 17, Number 1, pp. 99–120).

Kabir, A., Ikra, S. S., Saona, P., & Azad, M. A. K. (2023). Board gender diversity and firm performance: new evidence from cultural diversity in the boardroom. LBS Journal of Management & Research, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/lbsjmr-06-2022-0022

Li, T. T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). Esg: Research progress and future prospects. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111663

Lokuwaduge, C. S. D. S., & Heenetigala, K. (2017). Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Development: An Australian Study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1927

Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2022). Board Diversity and ESG Performance: Evidence from the Italian Banking Sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(20), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013447

Nadae, J. de, Carvalho, M. M., & Vieira, D. R. (2019). Exploring the influence of environmental and social standards in integrated management systems on economic performance of firms. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(5), 840–861. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2018-0190

Nuhu, Y., & Alam, A. (2024). Board characteristics and ESG disclosure in energy industry: evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-02-2023-0107

Omenihu, C. M., Abdrakhmanova, M., & Koufopoulos, D. N. (2025). Board Gender Diversity and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure in Developed Countries. Administrative Sciences, 15(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15040141

Pacheco, L., Lobo, C., & Maldonado, I. (2022). Do ISO Certifications Enhance Internationalization? The Case of Portuguese Industrial SMEs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031335

Ronalter, L. M., Bernardo, M., & Romaní, J. M. (2023). Quality and environmental management systems as business tools to enhance ESG performance: a cross-regional empirical study. In Environment, Development and Sustainability (Vol. 25, Number 9). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02425-0

Shahbaz, M., Karaman, A. S., Kilic, M., & Uyar, A. (2020). Board attributes, CSR engagement, and corporate performance: What is the nexus in the energy sector? Energy Policy, 143(May), 111582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111582

Shakil, M. H., Mahmood, N., Tasnia, M., & Munim, Z. H. (2019). Do environmental, social and governance performance affect the financial performance of banks? A cross-country study of emerging market banks. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(6), 1331–1344. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2018-0155

Shakil, M. H., Tasnia, M., & Mostafiz, M. I. (2020). Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance performance of US banks: moderating role of environmental, social and corporate governance controversies. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(4), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2020-0210

Tayo Tene, C. V., Boiral, O., & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2021). Does quality management improve the internalization of environmental practices? An empirical study in Africa. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3053–3064. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2788

Wang, K., Ma, J., Xue, C., & Zhang, J. (2024). Board Gender Diversity and Firm Performance: Recent Evidence from Japan. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17010020

Wasiuzzaman, S., & Wan Mohammad, W. M. (2020). Board gender diversity and transparency of environmental, social and governance disclosure: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3099

Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, M., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Kang, J. (2018). ESG and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082607




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33019/ijbe.v10i2.1609

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License

Integrated Journal of Business and Economics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.