Social Relations Behind Fraudulent Behavior: Enrichment of The Fraud Triangle Theory

Khairul Shaleh(1*), Gugus Irianto(2), Ali Djamhuri(3), Noval Adib(4),

(1) Widyatama University
(2) Universitas Brawijaya
(3) Universitas Brawijaya
(4) Universitas Brawijaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research aims to understand how village budget fraud is likely to occur because of patron-client social relations in the village government bureaucracy. This research uses qualitative methodology with an ethnographic exploration approach. They were collecting data through field observations and in-depth interviews with informants. The selection of informants uses a snowball technique approach. The field findings show that the social relations of village government heads with political sponsors have decreased the accountability performance of the village government. Political sponsors are not part of the village apparatus but intervene in many bureaucratic affairs of the village government. That successfully created a patronage influence on the ranks of village devices. Such circumstances make the internal control system malfunction so that financial procedures do not run as they should. In the end, the bond of social relations in the bureaucratic environment gives rise to the tendency of fraud to the village budget. This research enriches the theory of triangle fraud by including elements of social relations in the model.


Keywords


Fraud, Internal Control, Village Government Budget, Patron-Client Relations.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alatas, S. H. (1987). Korupsi : Sifat, Sebab dan Fungsi (1st ed.). LP3ES.

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C. ., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud Examination : Fourth Edition. South-Western, Cengage Learning ALL.

Andhika, L. R. (2018). Bahaya Patronase dan Klientalisme Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa Serentak. Jurnal Kajian, 22(3), 205–219.

Azis, M. A. bin A., Said, J., & Alam, M. M. (2015). Assessment of the Practices of Internal Control System in the Public Sectors of Malaysia . Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 10(1), 16.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Bungin, B. (2015). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Rajawali .

Cressey, D. R. (1964). Delinquency, Crime And Differential Association.

Geofrey, T., & Kungu, N. J. (2020). The Implication Of Political Patron-Client Linkages On Democratic Governance In Developing Democracies. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS), 7(4), 211–218. http://41.89.101.166:8080/handle/123456789/10755

Golden, M. A. (2000). Political Patronage, Bureaucracy and Corruption in Postwar Italy. In presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, (p. 31).

Golden, M. A. (2003). Electoral Connections : The Effects of the Personal Vote on Political Patronage , Bureaucracy and Legislation in Postwar Italy Electoral Connections : The Effects of the Personal Vote on Political Patronage , Bureaucracy and Legislation in Postwar Italy. British Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123403000085

Hanif, H. (2009). Politik Klientelisme Baru dan Dilema Demokratisasi di Indonesia ’. Jurnal Ilmu Sosiial Dan Ilmu Politik, 12(3), 257–390.

Ibietan, J. (2013). Corruption and Public Accountability in the Nigerian Public Sector : Interrogating the Omission . European Journal of Business and Management, 5(15), 41–49.

Irianto, G. (2003). Skandal Korporasi dan Akuntan. Lntasan Ekonomi, XX(2), 104–114.

Khan, M. (1998). Patron ‐ Client networks and the economic effects of corruption in Asia. European Journal of Development Research, 10(1), 15–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578819808426700

Khan, S., & Swapan, M. S. H. (2013). From blueprint master plans to democratic planning in South Asian cities: Pursuing good governance agenda against prevalent patron-client networks. Habitat International, 38, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.06.005

Kruger, S. (2019). Journal of transport and supply chain management – Editorial. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 13, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v13i0.480

Lestari, K. N. L., & Supadmi, N. L. (2017). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Integritas Dan Asimetri Informasi Pada Kecurangan Akuntansi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 21(1), 389–417.

Maulidi, A. (2020). Storytelling of bureaucratic white- collar crimes in Indonesia : is it a matter of reciprocal norm ? 27(2), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2019-0087

Mauss, M. (1992). The Gift, Form and Functions Of Exchange in Archaic Sosieties (Pertama). Yayasan Obor Indonesai.

Monteduro, F., Hinna, A., & Moi, S. (2016). Governance and corruption in the public sector: An extended literature review. Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance, 5, 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020160000005002

Murdiyanto, E. (2008). Sosiologi Perdesaan. UPN Yogyakarta Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods : Integrating Theory & Practice (Fourth). Sage Publication Ltd.

Putra, H. S. ahimsa. (2007). Patron & Client Di Sulawesi Selatan : Sebuah Kajian Fungsional Struktural (Edisi Baru). KEPEL.

Rendon, R. G., & Rendon, J. M. (2015). Auditability in public procurement: An analysis of internal controls and fraud vulnerability. International Journal of Procurement Management, 8(6), 710–730. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2015.072388

Rustiarini, N. W., Sutrisno, S., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Fraud triangle in public procurement: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(4), 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2018-0121

Rustiarini, N. W., T, S., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Why people commit public procurement fraud? The fraud diamond view. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-02-2019-0012

Sarker, A. E. (2008). International Journal of Public Patron-Client Politics and Its Implications for Good Governance in Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(12), 1416–1440.

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.

Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. The American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113.

Sufianto, D. (2018). Pola Hubungan Patronase Dalam Birokrasi Pemerintahan Daerah Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Jurnal Academia Praja, 1(2), 37–50.

Sulistyorini, A. (2020). Dari Urbanisasi Ke Ruralisasi From Urbanization To Ruralization. Jurnal Inovasi Aparatur, 2(1), 145–162.

Sumarti, T. (2007). Sosiologi Kepentingan ( Interest ) dalam Tindakan Ekonomi. Jurnal Transdisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi, Dan Ekologi Manusia, 01(02), 283–293.

Tunggal, A. W. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Audit Internal Pedoman Untuk Auditor Baru. Harvarindo.

Udjianto, D., Hakim, A., Domai, T., Suryadi, S., & Hayat, H. (2021). Community Development and Economic Welfare through the Village Fund Policy. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.563

Wahyuni, D. (2012). The research design maze: understanding paradigms,cases,methods and methodologies. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 10(1), 69–80.

Yuwanto, L. (2015). Profil Koruptor Berdasarkan Tinjauan Basic Human Values. Integritas, 1(1), 1–13.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33019/ijbe.v5i3.376

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 24 times
PDF - 14 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.